RTC Upgrade to 4.0.3 and Splitting of CCM and JTS
![](http://jazz.net/_images/myphoto/b69f9257dd49002142a40ffdc4254695.jpg)
3 answers
![](http://jazz.net/_images/myphoto/b69f9257dd49002142a40ffdc4254695.jpg)
: I would still perform the upgrade first. This way testing can be done in a tested configuration before making any changes.
Unless I misunderstood what is being attempted or there is a proxy in the topology, since the URI is not changing and only the appServer is then I would have to guess that both jts and ccm will be running on the same host. The concern I have with not changing the uri is that both appServers will be attempting to bind to the same host:port combination. In this scenario the first appServer to start will be able to bind where the other will get a port conflict.
Unless I misunderstood what is being attempted or there is a proxy in the topology, since the URI is not changing and only the appServer is then I would have to guess that both jts and ccm will be running on the same host. The concern I have with not changing the uri is that both appServers will be attempting to bind to the same host:port combination. In this scenario the first appServer to start will be able to bind where the other will get a port conflict.
![](http://jazz.net/_images/myphoto/b69f9257dd49002142a40ffdc4254695.jpg)
I would upgrade first.
For splitting jts and ccm, I suspect the uri will need to change. If this is the case, then a server rename will be needed...a PMR will need to be openned to work with support to 1)validate a server rename is appropriate and 2)provide the server rename key.
For splitting jts and ccm, I suspect the uri will need to change. If this is the case, then a server rename will be needed...a PMR will need to be openned to work with support to 1)validate a server rename is appropriate and 2)provide the server rename key.
![](http://jazz.net/_images/myphoto/b69f9257dd49002142a40ffdc4254695.jpg)
If a rename of the URI is needed depends on the URI the server already has.
Is a proxy configured?
If there is already a proxy working and the URI has no port within you won't need to rename the server.
If your URI contains a port you will need to do a rename I think as you have to get the port outside the URI. The proxy forwards your requests to the application defined with special ports (e.g. 9443 for ccm; 9445 for rrc, etc)
Hope this helps,
Simon
Is a proxy configured?
If there is already a proxy working and the URI has no port within you won't need to rename the server.
If your URI contains a port you will need to do a rename I think as you have to get the port outside the URI. The proxy forwards your requests to the application defined with special ports (e.g. 9443 for ccm; 9445 for rrc, etc)
Hope this helps,
Simon