Jazz Source Code Control - performance?

We haven't published anything... of course as you would expect we've done our own comparisons and encourage people to try it out and compare against their existing tooling. It shouldn't disappoint.

The DB affects the overall SCM performance, the default Derby install is the slowest, while the other commercial databases (DB2, Oracle, SQL Server) are a lot better for running benchmarks. So keep this in mind.

Jean-Michel
Jazz Source Control Team

Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind. (I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike

Yes, Jazz SCM was explicitly designed for WAN use.
In particular, we periodically do performance testing on high-latency
networks.

Cheers,
Geoff

micjohnson997 wrote:

Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like
Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind.
(I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest
when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN
scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike

Mike, please read the following to see how serious we are about WAN performance.

https://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/01/the-jazz-metronome-tool-keeps-us-honest/

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind. (I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike