It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,856

question asked: Nov 11 '08, 4:05 p.m.
question was seen: 5,870 times
last updated: Nov 11 '08, 4:05 p.m.

Related questions

Jazz Source Code Control - performance?

0
Mike Johnson (286●2●42●21) | asked Nov 11 '08, 4:05 p.m.
I've searched through jazz.net for any info on performance characteristics of Jazz source code control, but can't seem to find anything. Is there any document that compares/contrasts Jazz SC vs. other SCMs like Subversion, ClearCase, etc?

Thanks in advance,
Mike Johnson

4 answers

Most liked answers|Newest answers|Oldest answers ↑

0
permanent link
Jean-Michel Lemieux (2.5k●1●1) | answered Nov 12 '08, 10:00 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
We haven't published anything... of course as you would expect we've done our own comparisons and encourage people to try it out and compare against their existing tooling. It shouldn't disappoint.

The DB affects the overall SCM performance, the default Derby install is the slowest, while the other commercial databases (DB2, Oracle, SQL Server) are a lot better for running benchmarks. So keep this in mind.

Jean-Michel
Jazz Source Control Team
0
permanent link
Mike Johnson (286●2●42●21) | answered Nov 12 '08, 3:57 p.m.
Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind. (I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike
0
permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35) | answered Nov 12 '08, 6:28 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Yes, Jazz SCM was explicitly designed for WAN use.
In particular, we periodically do performance testing on high-latency
networks.

Cheers,
Geoff

micjohnson997 wrote:
Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like
Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind.
(I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest
when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN
scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike
0
permanent link
Jean-Michel Lemieux (2.5k●1●1) | answered Nov 12 '08, 10:21 p.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Mike, please read the following to see how serious we are about WAN performance.

https://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/01/the-jazz-metronome-tool-keeps-us-honest/

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

Thanks! I think one of the issues with ClearCase versus a system like Subversion is that CC doesn't seem to be designed with a WAN in mind. (I know of CCRC, but even the performance of that isn't the greatest when compared to Subversion, CVS, etc.)

Would you say that Jazz source control has been designed with WAN scenarios in mind?

Thanks,
Mike

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.