Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Building dependancies between Work Item Instances

Hi,
We want to build a strict sequence of work items:

Task c, cannot be started before task b,( and task b cannot be started before a, and so on).

How can we define , prepare such a behaviour at the process template level (or in ProjectArea)?

At the moment (in the Process Template) at Project Area Initialization Setup Project Server Follow/On actions, we have defined 7 Work Item Template. We would like to be able to set up some kind of 'dependancies|blocking' mechanism between these Work Items. (once again, the goal is that a task cannot be started before the previous is finished)

Any ideas? (we don't mind if the solution is very complicated or elaborate...)

0 votes



2 answers

Permanent link
Hi,

what we have are the blocks/depends links between work items, but these are not enforced in any way and the Setup follow-up action cannot be configured to create links between the work items.

If you wanted you could write your own setup follow-up action that supports links between work items and an operation participant for the 'save work item' operation that checks that all dependencies are resolved before a work item can be set 'in progress' or be resolved.

I've opened enhancements 59096 and 59097 to capture your requests.

Regards,

Christof
Jazz Work Item team


jessekiki wrote:
Hi,
We want to build a strict sequence of work items:

Task c, cannot be started before task b,( and task b cannot be started
before a, and so on).

How can we define , prepare such a behaviour at the process template
level (or in ProjectArea)?

At the moment (in the Process Template) at Project Area Initialization
Setup Project Server Follow/On actions, we have defined 7 Work Item
Template. We would like to be able to set up some kind of
'dependancies|blocking' mechanism between these Work Items. (once
again, the goal is that a task cannot be started before the previous
is finished)

Any ideas? (we don't mind if the solution is very complicated or
elaborate...)

0 votes


Permanent link
Hi,

what we have are the blocks/depends links between work items, but these are not enforced in any way and the Setup follow-up action cannot be configured to create links between the work items.

If you wanted you could write your own setup follow-up action that supports links between work items and an operation participant for the 'save work item' operation that checks that all dependencies are resolved before a work item can be set 'in progress' or be resolved.

I've opened enhancements 59096 and 59097 to capture your requests.

Regards,

Christof
Jazz Work Item team



Thx, Christof!
I had found depends/blocks and tried it as well(missing enforement:( ). Anyway, I'm looking forward to the enhancement. :D

0 votes

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details

Question asked: Jul 16 '08, 9:52 a.m.

Question was seen: 4,689 times

Last updated: Jul 16 '08, 9:52 a.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm