It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Time Spent for subscribers as well


Ferenc Kovács (61) | asked Jan 21 '11, 8:56 a.m.
Hi!

RTC 3.0 now support time tracking, which is cool. Currently only owners can make new time entries*, however there are some cases when the ownership of a task (being accountable for its success) separates from the fact that somebody is working on it. Take for instance a meeting or a 2hrs code review session. It would be handful to have the ability of skipping the creation of multiple subtask (one for each participant) and just let them booking their time onto the same task entry.

Any ideas?

Best regards,
Ferenc Kovcs

Associated topics: http://jazz.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13483&highlight=tracking

* 'Save Work Item' failed. Preconditions have not been met: CRRTC1704E You must be the owner of the work item to add the time tracking entries.

3 answers



permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k33035) | answered Jan 21 '11, 4:53 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
One simple approach is to just assign the task to yourself when you want
to record time spent around it.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 1/21/2011 9:08 AM, kovacsferenc wrote:
Hi!

RTC 3.0 now support time tracking, which is cool. Currently only
owners can make new time entries*, however there are some cases when
the ownership of a task (being accountable for its success) separates
from the fact that somebody is working on it. Take for instance a
meeting or a 2hrs code review session. It would be handful to have
the ability of skipping the creation of multiple subtask (one for
each participant) and just let them booking their time onto the same
task entry.

Any ideas?

Best regards,
Ferenc Kovcs

Associated topics:
http://jazz.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13483&highlight=tracking

* 'Save Work Item' failed. Preconditions have not been
met: CRRTC1704E You must be the owner of the work item to add the
time tracking entries.

permanent link
Ferenc Kovács (61) | answered Jan 22 '11, 3:58 a.m.
One simple approach is to just assign the task to yourself when you want
to record time spent around it.

Cheers,
Geoff


Yes, we figured out the same however I'm afraid there will be some side-effects at reporting (task history, etc.)

Thanks,
Ferenc

permanent link
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k33035) | answered Jan 22 '11, 10:23 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
The side effects are likely to be positive. If two people are in fact
working on the same task, it would be appropriate for both of them to
appear as having been the "owner" at some time. But for accountability,
it is preferable for you to actually instantiate the sub-tasks, so you
can track who was actually doing what.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 1/22/2011 4:08 AM, kovacsferenc wrote:
gmclemmwrote:
One simple approach is to just assign the task to yourself when you
want
to record time spent around it.

Cheers,
Geoff


Yes, we figured out the same however I'm afraid there will be some
side-effects at reporting (task history, etc.)

Thanks,
Ferenc

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.