No schema found for 'org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus' extension po
Hello,
I am trying to configure RTC SDK 3.0 environment. I already followed steps from https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/RTCSDK20_DevelopmentEnvironmentSetup#For_RTC_2_0_0_x_3_0.
Now when I am trying to add new extension in PDE manifest editor (extensions tab) from Eclipse extension points e.g. "org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus" I am receiving following error:
"No schema found for 'org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus' extension point"
As a consequence PDE manifest editor is useless for me and I must edit manually plugin.xml to add new extensions from Eclipse platform.
Is it bug in RTC SDK that schema are not added to Eclipse plugins? Is there any workaround?
I am trying to configure RTC SDK 3.0 environment. I already followed steps from https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/RTCSDK20_DevelopmentEnvironmentSetup#For_RTC_2_0_0_x_3_0.
Now when I am trying to add new extension in PDE manifest editor (extensions tab) from Eclipse extension points e.g. "org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus" I am receiving following error:
"No schema found for 'org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus' extension point"
As a consequence PDE manifest editor is useless for me and I must edit manually plugin.xml to add new extensions from Eclipse platform.
Is it bug in RTC SDK that schema are not added to Eclipse plugins? Is there any workaround?
9 answers
It's more of a bug in the Eclipse SDK. They should include the schema in the binary for the org.eclipse.ui plug-in, but instead it's only in the source plug-in, org.eclipse.ui.source.
I suggest downloading the Eclipse SDK (3.5.2) and either copying that single plugin jar to your PDE target platform, or add the whole Eclipse SDK as a location in your target platform. PDE should be able to sort out any version conflicts between the two.
I suggest downloading the Eclipse SDK (3.5.2) and either copying that single plugin jar to your PDE target platform, or add the whole Eclipse SDK as a location in your target platform. PDE should be able to sort out any version conflicts between the two.
I've filed https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/211674 for the missing schema. You should only need the schema if you're contributing your own extensions to that extension point. If you are, then you can get a good idea of the schema by looking at other extensions to that extension point (in the plugin.xml for the same plugin).
I've filed https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/211674 for the missing schema. You should only need the schema if you're contributing your own extensions to that extension point. If you are, then you can get a good idea of the schema by looking at other extensions to that extension point (in the plugin.xml for the same plugin).
I am looking at making additional updates to an existing extension to extension point com.ibm.team.filesystem.cli.core.subcommand. I am a novice at this and any help (including a schema) would be quite helpful.
Thanks for looking into it. Would you able to give me an idea as to what happens next? Or how soon I might be able to get an upgrade that gives me the access to this schema? Or are you aware of a work around?
I suggest subscribing to the work item to track its progress. I've attached the current schema there. Knowing the schema won't help you with changing the behaviour of an existing extension though. I suggest filing a separate enhancement request against Source Control, asking for what you need, and asking for advice on possible workarounds with the current support.
I suggest subscribing to the work item to track its progress. I've attached the current schema there. Knowing the schema won't help you with changing the behaviour of an existing extension though. I suggest filing a separate enhancement request against Source Control, asking for what you need, and asking for advice on possible workarounds with the current support.
Nick:
Just to be clear here, Kanj is looking for the extension point schema because we are contributing extensions to that extension point. Since there is no schema currently the fields are something of a mystery; some are pretty obvious but others (scope, for example) are not.
I think the hope here is that the schema will help shed some light on the purpose of the various fields. Is it your impression that this won't be the case?
Is there any other documentation available for this extension point beyond examining the source of RTC's contributions?