Running BOTH the CQ Connector and the CQ Bridge
![]()
Are there any reasons (technical or otherwise) that would prevent running BOTH the CQ Connector and CQ Bridge against the same CQ User Database?
In the specific scenario I am concerned with, the CQ Connector is being used to synchronize some data from CQ records to RTC work items. The fields being synchronized from CQ to RTC are read-only in RTC. However, the CQ Bridge is also being used from within RTC to provide access to a variety of records (parents and children in the CQ ALM Schema) that all eventually contributed to the need to synchronize a CQ record with an RTC work item in the first place. The usage model of deploying both the connector and bridge seems unusual; versus deploying one or the other. Thanks, -Chris |
3 answers
![]()
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Oct 07 '10, 9:02 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
First a terminological note ... we're regularizing the CC and CQ
Connector terminology in RTC-3.0 ... in particular, "Connector" is now the generic term for any data-level integration between two repositories. There are three kinds of connectors: bridges, synchronizers, and importers. But back to your actual question, the CQ Synchronizer and the CQ Bridge were designed to be used together, so if you encounter any problems doing so, please report it. In general, the guidance is to initially use the Bridge (simplest to set up), and then introduce the Synchronizer when the Bridge does not give you all the functionality that you need. Cheers, Geoff On 10/6/2010 6:07 PM, clkolde wrote: Are there any reasons (technical or otherwise) that would prevent |
![]() First a terminological note ... we're regularizing the CC and CQ Are there any reasons (technical or otherwise) that would prevent |
![]()
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Oct 07 '10, 10:41 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
To clarify, once you have concluded that the Bridge is not sufficient,
then either replacing the Bridge with the Synchronizer, or enhancing the Bridge with the Synchronizer, is reasonable. So using both together is a reasonable and supported configuration. Cheers, Geoff On 10/7/2010 9:52 PM, clkolde wrote: gmclemmwrote: |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.