It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

RRC and Quality Center


Eamon McCormick (4195) | asked May 06 '10, 4:08 p.m.
Are their plans for an integration between RRC and HP Quality Center?

Thanks!

6 answers



permanent link
Daniel Moul (5.0k1318) | answered May 07 '10, 8:43 a.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Currently the way to integrate RRC and HP QC is via RequisitePro or DOORS. We recognize this isn't ideal in most cases; direct integration is needed. We can't talk publicly yet about plans to address this, but stay tuned.

That said, it would be helpful to hear from you what you see as the primary user scenarios that should be supported in a RRC-HP QC integration.

Daniel

permanent link
Jonathan Belanger (3652) | answered Aug 04 '10, 3:02 p.m.
Currently the way to integrate RRC and HP QC is via RequisitePro or DOORS. We recognize this isn't ideal in most cases; direct integration is needed. We can't talk publicly yet about plans to address this, but stay tuned.

That said, it would be helpful to hear from you what you see as the primary user scenarios that should be supported in a RRC-HP QC integration.

Daniel


Hi Daniel,

As a customer of both RTC and HP QC, a better integration between DOORS and the Jazz environment (RTC, RRC, DOORS, and CQ). If you want to see the tight integration I'd like to see, go to Borland's web site and look at the integration between CaliberRM and HP QC. From my perspective, I'd like to be able to link requirements in DOORS to QC Test Cases, create defects in QC that are actually created in CQ. I'd actually like HP QC to look an awful lot like RQM.

Jon.

permanent link
Eamon McCormick (4195) | answered Aug 05 '10, 9:46 a.m.
Currently the way to integrate RRC and HP QC is via RequisitePro or DOORS. We recognize this isn't ideal in most cases; direct integration is needed. We can't talk publicly yet about plans to address this, but stay tuned.

That said, it would be helpful to hear from you what you see as the primary user scenarios that should be supported in a RRC-HP QC integration.

Daniel


Hi Daniel, my customers are interested in being able to either create Test Cases in RRC, that are tied to requirements, and then move them over to QC with the links intact. Or, they'd like to be able to auto-generate Test Cases in QC from requirements in RRC, and maintain traceability. In any case, they want to make sure they can tie QC Test Cases back to RRC requirements and run coverage reports.

permanent link
Keith Collyer (456511) | answered Aug 18 '10, 10:26 p.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
If you want to see the tight integration I'd like to see, go to Borland's web site and look at the integration between CaliberRM and HP QC.

Jon,

I went to the Borland site as you suggested and couldn't find anything on there that gave a clue about how this integration worked. Maybe it's there, but I could not find it. Could you give examples of what you mean?

Of course, the ideal situation would be for QC to adopt OSLC as an interface. It is probably unlikely that Rational could persuade HP of this, but perhaps if sufficient customers applied pressure...

permanent link
Andy Rutherford (611) | answered Dec 12 '11, 7:51 p.m.
Hi,

As the last update to this thread was over a year ago I thought I'd ask to see if there was any news on the integration between RRC and HP Quality Center?


Thanks

Andy

permanent link
Robin Bater (3.4k47) | answered Dec 13 '11, 1:05 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Hi,

As the last update to this thread was over a year ago I thought I'd ask to see if there was any news on the integration between RRC and HP Quality Center?


Thanks

Andy


This is the plan item for the integration

https://jazz.net/jazz03/web/projects/Requirements%20Management#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=44237

As part of this 2012 plan

https://jazz.net/jazz03/web/projects/Requirements%20Management#action=com.ibm.team.apt.viewPlan&page=com.ibm.team.apt.web.ui.plannedItems&id=_VBH2wKG5EeCUuZ6KJYHdnw

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.