Rational Jazz Team Server Version 1.0.0.1
When using the RTC client to administer the Jazz Team Server being used for RQM, after having upgraded to RQM 2.0.0.1, I have noticed that the server information properties for the project I am using shows the Rational Jazz Team Server (RQM) as being version 1.0.0.1 although the build id is I20090914-1300.
I've seen on an IBM technote
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&q1=rational+jazz+team+server&q2=version&q3=1.0.0.1&q4=I20090914-1300&uid=swg21405560&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&cc=us&lang=en
that it also refers to version 1.0.0.1
Is this expected, a bug, or a problem with the server upgrade?
I've seen on an IBM technote
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&q1=rational+jazz+team+server&q2=version&q3=1.0.0.1&q4=I20090914-1300&uid=swg21405560&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&cc=us&lang=en
that it also refers to version 1.0.0.1
Is this expected, a bug, or a problem with the server upgrade?
2 answers
This is normal/expected.
RQM 2.0.0.1 uses Jazz Foundation/Jazz team server 1.0.0.1, much like RQM 2.0 used Jazz Foundation 1.0.
If you check Help > About Rational Quality Manager in the WebUI, you will also see this.
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/6166/snap006q.jpg
RQM 2.0.0.1 uses Jazz Foundation/Jazz team server 1.0.0.1, much like RQM 2.0 used Jazz Foundation 1.0.
Rational Quality Manager 2.x will be built on Rational Team Concert 2.0 and Jazz Foundation 1.0--Rational Quality Manager 2.0 Release Plan - https://jazz.net/projects/rational-quality-manager/release-plan-2.0/
If you check Help > About Rational Quality Manager in the WebUI, you will also see this.
This is normal/expected.
RQM 2.0.0.1 uses Jazz Foundation/Jazz team server 1.0.0.1, much like RQM 2.0 used Jazz Foundation 1.0.
Rational Quality Manager 2.x will be built on Rational Team Concert 2.0 and Jazz Foundation 1.0--Rational Quality Manager 2.0 Release Plan - https://jazz.net/projects/rational-quality-manager/release-plan-2.0/
If you check Help > About Rational Quality Manager in the WebUI, you will also see this.
Thanks, I read that afterwards, that's a relief!