Auto creation of folder structure in component of particular stream
Hi,
I have to create server side extension to auto creation of folder structure in component of particular stream. So is there any API available for it. or if RTC have capability to auto creation of folder structure in component.
If yes, kindly provide solution for it.
Thanks in Advanced.
|
2 answers
Are you referring to creating folders in a project that is shared to a component in a stream? If so, that's pretty easy, but you have to share that project to the component. You cannot just create folders in a component without having a project. Comments 1
Geoffrey Clemm
commented Apr 11 '19, 6:13 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Note that a "project" is only necessary when you are using a project-based IDE such as Eclipse to create the folders ... the APIs used to create folders in an RTC repository workspace do not require a project. |
Ralph Schoon (63.4k●3●36●46)
| answered Apr 10 '19, 4:46 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER edited Apr 10 '19, 4:47 a.m. The question really lacks details. Carefully read and digest this: How should I ask a question in the Forum if I want to receive useful answers? and follow the suggestions.
If you want to create a folder structure that you want to share, check into a repository workspace or Stream and/or deliver to a stream, I am not sure if there is server API.
How the client API works is explained here: https://rsjazz.wordpress.com/2013/10/15/extracting-an-archive-into-jazz-scm-using-the-plain-java-client-libraries/ and in the related posts.
Some hints about possible ways to find a server API can be found here: https://rsjazz.wordpress.com/2016/02/04/setting-custom-attributes-for-scm-versionables/ and in the related posts.
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.
Comments
Do you ever used API? Maybe look for a solution on youtube? :)
No Kenny,
This is a comment, which you should have used to comment to Kennys answer.
I've converted Pallavi's "answer" to be a comment.