Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

Can I Generate a User-Defined Report Sent "directly" to an EXCEL File? (non-Report Builder)

BACKGROUND:
I have my user-defined "View" for my RDNG Requirements Module.  From the Module's Triple-Bar icon, I'll invoke this RDNG feature:
                             "Generate a Report with This View"
This Feature allows me to generate a Report with these selected column headings:
              "DOORS Id"

              "Contents" that could be:

                        "Section" column: Paragraph Number & Verbiage

                        "System Requirement" verbiage
               Artifact Type
               Links From
               Links To
The feature "Generate a Report with This View" sends above columns to one of these file formats:
                            PDF
                            MS-Word
                            HTML   
                            XSL-FO
After selecting either Word or HTML, I'll manually copy the tabular data(systems requirements & section data)
out to an EXCEL spreadsheet, and format it accordingly.

QUESTION:
Is there a RDNG generate report feature(outside of the Report Builder and RPE), that allows me to generate
exactly the same Report as above, "but" have it Sent Directly Out to a EXCEL Spreadsheet?

NOTE:
1) Report Builder:  I've learned it, used  it.  But my co-worker saw a demand to pull a Requirements
along with the Rqmt's Paragraph Number and Paragraph Verbiage.   As many of you may know,
Report Builder can only pull the Paragraph verbiage(artifact "Heading").
2) RPE: As of this writing my work site did not employ RPE.

Any input would be appreciated

Thanks in Advance...

CarlosG

0 votes



One answer

Permanent link

Hi Carlos - 


Not sure if you've already found your answer, but later versions of RPE can generate to excel. This was as of CLM v6.0.5. what's new (6.0.5). While this may not fix your current predicament, it's something in the pipeline. 

Other than that, I absolutely hear you that porting data from word to excel is painful. If upgrading isn't in your future, maybe consider doing something along these lines?
  1. Lift code from a post like this (stackexchange). 
  2. Save the module in your normal.dotm template - this code can now be accessed from all word docs OR Import the code into a different .dot / .dotm file and specify a template for RPE. All new docs should house the code you had saved. 
  3. Execute your macro after document generation. 
I know that may seem cumbersome, but that's the best alternative in my opinion. 

Good luck!

David

0 votes

Comments

Thanks David,
I fear I left out a few points.    Began learning RDNG since Feb. And started working last May
building projects and importing/linking documents.   Prior experience was  with DOORS Classic,
10  yrs as an End-User at my last work site.   As a result...
1) Report Builder:  I've learned it, used  it.  But my work site saw a demand to pull
             Requirements and
             Rqmt's Paragraph Number and Paragraph Verbiage.  
         As you may know, Report Builder can only pull the Paragraph verbiage(artifact "Heading").
2) RPE: As of this writing my work site did not employ RPE.   I smiled when you mentioned RPE. 
That was mentioned to me as a solution to another Blog question.  

I guess the "search continues"...

Thanks!

Sorry, I missed that in your initial question. I see that now. Without RPE, this is difficult.. but not impossible. After all, RPE is just a wrapper for a complicated mechanism of REST calls, but not one that is impossible to approximate. You could take some inspiration from https://jazz.net/library/article/1482 -- but that's probably overkill. 


You could still embed a macro in your normal.dotm that extracts tabular data to excel. It's a bit of a pain with tinkering, but it works. That's probably significantly less effort and seems to fit your current process. 

Either way, best of luck to you!

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 231
× 64
× 39

Question asked: Oct 24 '18, 4:11 p.m.

Question was seen: 4,414 times

Last updated: Oct 25 '18, 3:28 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm