Jazz Forum Welcome to the Jazz Community Forum Connect and collaborate with IBM Engineering experts and users

RTC Client Plug-in v5.0.2 and Server 6.0.3 compatiblility

I am working through the Lab Exercises for creating server extensions.  I am attempting to setup my development environment to match our production environment.  We have the 6.0.3 version on our production servers but we are still using the Client Plug-in v5.0.2. 

When I launch the server using the server.startup script in Linux, I can view the server in Firefox through the web interface.  When I attempt to establish a connection through Eclipse however, I get the following error message:

CRJAZ1371E: The following URL cannot be reached: https://localhost:4993/ccm/versionCompatibility?clientVersion=5.0.2.  The server cannot be reached.  The network could not connect to the server.  Connection refused.

Is there something I need to configure on the server to allow a connection from a previous version of the client?

0 votes


Accepted answer

Permanent link

Please read https://rsjazz.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/new-version-and-now-experiences-with-sdk-and-plain-java-api-across-tool-versions/

In general you want to have the Plain Java API and the SDK on the same version as your server environment.
5.0.2 should work with 6.0.x, but there are a reasons why you don't want to just stay with this. One is that backward compatibility can have performance impact.

However, I don't believe that is the issue here. The problem might be the URL or port. The very strange port number 4993 might be contributing.
 
Regardless, please upgrade the client API to the server version.

Ryan McFadden selected this answer as the correct answer

1 vote

Comments

We have plans to upgrade the client in the future.  Currently we have some compatibility issues that prevent us from upgrading at this time.  After posting I found the advanced server setting that specifies the minimum client version and it is set to 5.x. 

I found the issue.  In the team invitation I was using the port number of 4993 instead of 9443. 

Your answer

Register or log in to post your answer.

Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.

Search context
Follow this question

By Email: 

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here.

By RSS:

Answers
Answers and Comments
Question details
× 10,937
× 6,121
× 10

Question asked: Feb 26 '18, 6:00 p.m.

Question was seen: 2,229 times

Last updated: Feb 27 '18, 12:57 p.m.

Confirmation Cancel Confirm