What are the benefits of using RTC component hierarchies, and why isn't it reflected in how files are loaded?
GURVINDER SOKHI (73●13●40)
| asked Jan 24 '17, 12:58 p.m.
converted to question Jan 26 '17, 12:38 a.m. by Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35) we are based on v6.0.2 trying to leverage new SCM component hierarchy capability launched with RTC v6. We have enabled SCM component hierarchy setting on CCM server settings page. Whilst I am able to add/remove sub-components to hierarchy , I don't see the subcomponent hierarchy changes reflected in my associated sandbox folder structure or its load rules ? I believe one of the key benefits of SCM component hierarchy is to track dependencies between components however that can be already done by snapshots with RTC 5.0.2. In view of above can someone explain the following: 1. what are the benefits of SCM component hierarchy vs snapshot taking into account a snapshot would capture dependencies between components. 2. once on repository workspace the component hierarchy is introduced (see example screenshot attached) then why isn't the component hierarchy change getting reflected to the associated sandbox file system and its load rules ? |
One answer
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Jan 26 '17, 1:12 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.
Comments
As a reminder, new questions such as this should be posted as questions, not as "answers" to previously posted questions. In addition, when there are two distinct questions being asked, they are best posted as two distinct questions.