How can I tell if a Defect Work Item is fixed in 2.0?
It looks as though the build was done on 6/18/2009 based on file timestamps. The Planned For, Resolution (i.e. "Fixed), and Resolution date can provide clues, but none seem to be definitive, especially when the resolution date is around June 18, 2009. There seems to be a lot of work item cleanup done in July that I'm guessing made it into 2.0.
Preferably, I'd like to be able tell by running a query because there are thousands of defects to scan.
Preferably, I'd like to be able tell by running a query because there are thousands of defects to scan.
5 answers
Ed, the real answer is the combination of "planned for" and the
"Included in Build". If the change requires code changes, then it should
of been added to a build and will be tracked. If it doesn't, then the
"planned for" is the right answer.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
On 8/12/2009 5:53 PM, Packer wrote:
"Included in Build". If the change requires code changes, then it should
of been added to a build and will be tracked. If it doesn't, then the
"planned for" is the right answer.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
On 8/12/2009 5:53 PM, Packer wrote:
It looks as though the build was done on 6/18/2009 based on file
timestamps. The Planned For, Resolution (i.e. "Fixed), and
Resolution date can provide clues, but none seem to be definitive,
especially when the resolution date is around June 18, 2009. There
seems to be a lot of work item cleanup done in July that I'm guessing
made it into 2.0.
Preferably, I'd like to be able tell by running a query because there
are thousands of defects to scan.
I see hundreds of Defect work items with a resolution of "Won't
Fix".
In general, what should one conclude regarding the impact of such
defects?
I've looked at several, most of which appear to non-defects or fixed
in some way. One appears to be unresolved (major defect 49728).
Some of the reasons why a defect can be resolved as "Won't Fix' are:
- A request does no longer make sense, because the functionality is now
different
- Sometimes the resolution "Won't Fix" is used instead of "Invalid"
If you think that a work item is not legitimately marked as "Won't fix",
please add a comment to the work item asking for the reasons.
--
Regards,
Patrick
Jazz Work Item Team