Best practice for organizing and moving large number of requirements into a DNG module
I have a need to organize my requirements into sets. I then need to copy the sets into modules. I tried using collections as the container, but collections cannot be added to a module. I then created a new artifact to use to hold the requirements and then added the new artifact to my modules. That work properly, but it will not print the contents of the requirements, only the title of the requirement. I am probably over thinking this. Is there a best practice for organizing requirements and using a set of requirements in a module? I also know I can use tags, but tagging a bunch (100s) or requirements just to add them to a module is cumbersome. Thanks! |
One answer
It depends on how you define the "set", and how you organize the requirement artifacts into "sets". For example, when you attempted with a collection, how did you filter the requirements so that you could pick the right ones? If you can apply the same filtering technique when adding artifacts to a module, there should be not much differences.
Comments
Jim Tompkins
commented Apr 06 '16, 9:58 a.m.
Thank you for the reply.
We organize our requirements into sets which represent reusable capability. For example we could have a set of requirements which describe a grid control. The grid control, along with its requirements, are used in several different products.
Any thoughts or input is appreciated.
Donald Nong
commented Apr 12 '16, 3:29 a.m.
The best approach that I can think of is using folders.
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.