RTC 502 objects not picked up in work item package.
I added a new QLNKSRC member for a new *PGM for the IBM i dependency build. Manually added the dependencies to the source data. the build and the promotion both pick up the *PGM and generate the *PGM object correctly. so the build map looks correct. changes all linked to a work item. However when I do a package for that work item - the *Module is included but not the *PGM.
IBM i V7R2, RTC V5.02
|
Accepted answer
After a closer look, it appears there is a bug here. Fixing in defect 367061.
Melissa Weaver selected this answer as the correct answer
|
2 other answers
Hi Melissa,
How was the package invoked? was the "Include Impacted Outputs" check box selected? You stated that dependencies had been manually added to the source code data. There is no need to add the dependencies manually; the mail list sample application includes PGM and SRVPGM objects. See also the "link-edit" section in https://jazz.net/library/article/1095. Comments
Melissa Weaver
commented Aug 26 '15, 5:04 p.m.
Thank you for the response. I created a new PGM MLGRPTC to call the MLGRPTC CLP program. Set up the QLNKSRC. delivered, promoted and packaged everything. Then I made an additional change to the MLGRPTC CLP. Ran a build and promote that both picked up the CLP as well as the PGM. When I created a package for that work item , only the CLP was included. the *PGM does not get updated as I would have expected. I checked the include dependent objects.
I checked the translator per the article, and it has the inspect object.... checked.
Hi Melissa,
It's curious that you're build is picking up the MLGRPTC PGM but the packaging is not. Is there any chance you've set the packaging definition (or request) with an exclude filter which would omit the MLGRPTC PGM?
Melissa Weaver
commented Aug 27 '15, 6:43 p.m.
There is no exclude that I know of. |
Hi Melissa,
I tried to reproduce your scenario. But the packaging worked for me; here is what I did:
|
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.
Comments
Tested this in RTC 6.0 and it appears to be an issue in that release also.