It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,883
×10,915

question asked: Jan 27 '15, 10:30 a.m.
question was seen: 4,151 times
last updated: Sep 01 '17, 9:13 a.m.

Related questions

How to update custom attribute via OSLC

0
Carlito V (11●1●5●6) | asked Jan 27 '15, 10:30 a.m.
We use oslc4Net for updating Work-items in RTC.
Custom attributes are different and we need your assistance to understand the way to update them.
Maybe you can give an example in oslc4net.
Thanks!

2 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

1
permanent link
Donald Nong (14.5k●6●14) | answered Jan 27 '15, 6:20 p.m.
What differences of customer attributes did you notice? If you're aware of them, you should just treat them differently. As far as I know, the only difference is that custom attributes are in the name space "rtc_ext". The way to retrieve and update these attributes is no different from the "built-in" ones.
Comments
Yehiel Glass commented Jan 28 '15, 2:32 a.m. | edited Jan 28 '15, 8:38 p.m.

Hi Donald,

Yopur answewr helped me!

I was wrong in the namespace :

Why on get operation I get rtc_cm namespace and not rtc_ext?

This is my code:

var d = new Dictionary<QName, object>();

d.Add(new QName("http://jazz.net/xmlns/prod/jazz/rtc/ext/1.0/", "msp_task_uniqeid", "rtc_ext"), "3333");

d.Add(new QName("http://jazz.net/xmlns/prod/jazz/rtc/ext/1.0/", "testme", "rtc_ext"), "3333");

changeRequest.SetExtendedProperties(d);

Thanks!

Donald Nong commented Jan 28 '15, 8:40 p.m.

If you meant that when you did the GET operation and got the custom attribute in the "rtc_cm" namespace, it sounds like a defect to me.

0
permanent link
Sujith Babu Bandla (26●6) | answered Sep 01 '17, 9:13 a.m.

Hi Donald,


Thank you...This post helped me to set the custom attribute values programatically using Java.

Thanks,
Sujith

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.