It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,880
×7,474
×5
×1

question asked: Feb 19 '14, 5:15 a.m.
question was seen: 3,577 times
last updated: Feb 19 '14, 6:02 a.m.

Related questions

Is the Item Connector Framework still up-to-date and does it work for RTC 4?

0
Johannes Müller (8●1●2) | asked Feb 19 '14, 5:15 a.m.
Hi everyone,
for our workflow it is necessary to synchronize two different RTC Instances. Since I haven't found an appropriate tool to perform this synchronization I thought about writing something myself based on the Item Connector Framework. Unfortunately the Item Connector documentation that I found is still referring to RTC 1.0.X and RTC 2.0.

My question is: Does the Item Connector Framework still work with RTC 4 and is the documentation mentioned above still valid or did I simply not find a current version.

You're help is very much appreciated.

Accepted answer

0
permanent link
Ralph Schoon (63.5k●3●36●46) | answered Feb 19 '14, 5:30 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Since the connector framework is used by our own synchronizers e.g. CQ synchronizer, my assumption would be, it still is up to date and works for 4.x.
Johannes Müller selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments
sam detweiler commented Feb 19 '14, 6:02 a.m.

yes, it still works the same. my RM built in the 2.0.0.2 days continues to work unchanged.

the framework hasn't been enhanced either, as IBM has gone the linking route since then,
(OSLC is about links, not synch)

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.