It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Follow this question
Question details

×42,790
×11,931
×368
×73
×35
×26

question asked: Apr 25 '13, 3:05 a.m.
question was seen: 5,427 times
last updated: Apr 30 '13, 2:57 a.m.

Related questions

FAQ - How this Forum works

Printfrendly version of comparrison between baselines.

0
Sofus Albertsen (47●10●14) | asked Apr 25 '13, 3:05 a.m.
We have a customer that has 3 products:
ProdA
ProdB
ProdC

All of them have several versions (V1.0,V1.1 etc.)
For each of the versions there are created a snapshot.

The customer then wants to print out a report/paper that includes the Summary and Description workitems that have been associated with changesets from two snapshots compared with each other.

Is there a good way to do that?

Thanks in advance.
-Sofus Albertsen

3 answers

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

4
permanent link
Steven Holtsberg (296●6●5) | answered Apr 26 '13, 5:12 p.m.
edited Apr 26 '13, 5:20 p.m.
Have you tried the "S -i" option of the "scm compare" command to compare your two snapshots? It will display the result showing all work items, grouped by change set.  Here is an example of such a command:

lscm compare -r URL -S i snapshot snapshot1 snapshot snapshot2

You also use the "-j" option to get a parseable output that you can format as you wish.

There is no way to include the work items' descriptions in the output, just their summaries.
1
permanent link
Daniel Toczala (882●1●15●14) | answered Apr 29 '13, 11:27 a.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Read my blog post on a Simple RTC Baseline Comparison Script.  It was written back in 2011 (!), but it should still work.
0
permanent link
Sofus Albertsen (47●10●14) | answered Apr 30 '13, 2:57 a.m.
Thanks both of you for your answers.
I ended up making both a script for the client, as well as a guide for how to make the report within Eclipse as well.

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.