RTC / CC Synchronization
![]()
Simon Eickel (1.1k●7●54●57)
| asked Mar 14 '13, 6:40 a.m.
retagged Mar 15 '13, 2:55 p.m. by Hadar Hawk (188●22●14)
Hi everybody,
I'm facing logical problems while trying to synchronize from RTC to CC. The Project Structure in RTC is this that the Component contains as root element a folder named the same way as the component, e.g. Component: TestMe |--> Folder: TestMe |--> data When I know try to synchronize this structure to ClearCase using the sub-VOB components I get inside the VOB the same structure: VOBname |--> folder1 |--> Directory: TestMe (as component) |--> Directoy: TestMe (sub component folder) |--> data Is it possible to avoid the "two dir named the same" structur? Means is it possible to get either the component name or the sub component folder name away? Greetings, Simon |
3 answers
![]()
Geoffrey Clemm (30.1k●3●30●35)
| answered Mar 16 '13, 2:34 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
The relative pathname in RTC (relative to the RTC component root) of each replicated file/directory is the same as its relative pathname in ClearCase (relative to the corresponding the ClearCase component root) file/directory. So if you have a folder named "TestMe" under the RTC component root directory, you will have a folder named "TestMe" under the ClearCase component root directory.
Just for interest's sake, why is it important to have a TestMe folder in the RTC component, but not have one in the corresponding ClearCase component? Comments Hi Geoff,
![]() FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Why aren't your users just using the "Browse the components to select the folders to be loaded" option? If they select it once, it will become the default load option. It seems like that would be the simplest approach.
They want to use the "normal" option as for the other one in VS they need to expand "advanced" and choose it and the project admins think this is too much overhead for the normal developer.
![]() FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Have you considered using load rules? You can define in the load rule file exactly how the components in the workspace should be loaded, and all your users can then use that shared load rule to initialize their workspaces consistently.
Hi Geoff,
|
![]()
I created an RFE for this request:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=33885 |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.