When to use WAS and WAS ND?
Do we have examples of different topologies when one plans to use single server installation of CLM?
My basic question is, For better performance is it good to use plain WAS and different profiles for each of them application OR one should deploy WAS ND and create different nodes for applications like JTS, CCM, QM and RM?
Thanks for sharing details on WAS and WAS ND based scenario and guidance.
My basic question is, For better performance is it good to use plain WAS and different profiles for each of them application OR one should deploy WAS ND and create different nodes for applications like JTS, CCM, QM and RM?
Thanks for sharing details on WAS and WAS ND based scenario and guidance.
One answer
Hi, if nobody else wants to step up......
I would suggest to look at the topologies described here: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v3r0m1/index.jsp
Instead of hosting several profiles on one host a fully distributed topology with a proxy in front of it is most likely the best scaling solution.
Several profiles on one CPI will require more resources such as memory of one CPU.
I would suggest to look at the topologies described here: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v3r0m1/index.jsp
Instead of hosting several profiles on one host a fully distributed topology with a proxy in front of it is most likely the best scaling solution.
Several profiles on one CPI will require more resources such as memory of one CPU.