Search user to change owner throw exception
We are using RAM version is 7.2.0.2, fix pack 6. When I select an asset to change owner, it will popup a window to search the user , but we always got exception like this when want to search a user by his mail:
CRRAM0001E 464501480 ERROR pagecode.error.Error - javax.faces.FacesException: #{pc_UserSearchDialog.doSearch}: javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com/ibm/ram/repository/security/UserSearchUtilities.searchSpecificUsers(Ljava/lang/String;ZLcom/ibm/ram/repository/security/IUser;)Lcom/ibm/ram/common/util/ClosableIterator; at com.sun.faces.application.ActionListenerImpl.processAction(ActionListenerImpl.java:79) at javax.faces.component.UICommand.broadcast(UICommand.java:312) at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.broadcastEvents(UIViewRoot.java:302) at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processApplication(UIViewRoot.java:419) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.InvokeApplicationPhase.execute(InvokeApplicationPhase.java:77) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.phase(LifecycleImpl.java:220) at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:91) at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:197) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1146) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1087) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:145) at com.ibm.ram.repository.web.security.RAMServletFilter.doFilter(RAMServletFilter.java:417) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.FilterInstanceWrapper.doFilter(FilterInstanceWrapper.java:190) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:130) at com.ibm.ram.repository.web.filters.GZipFilter.doFilter(GZipFilter.java:45) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.FilterInstanceWrapper.doFilter(FilterInstanceWrapper.java:190) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:130) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain._doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:87) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterManager.doFilter(WebAppFilterManager.java:837) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterManager.doFilter(WebAppFilterManager.java:680) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:588) at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:524) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.CacheServletWrapper.handleRequest(CacheServletWrapper.java:90) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:751) at com.ibm.ws.wswebcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:1478) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.channel.WCChannelLink.ready(WCChannelLink.java:125) at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleDiscrimination(HttpInboundLink.java:458) at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleNewInformation(HttpInboundLink.java:387) at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpICLReadCallback.complete(HttpICLReadCallback.java:102) at com.ibm.ws.ssl.channel.impl.SSLReadServiceContext$SSLReadCompletedCallback.complete(SSLReadServiceContext.java:1818) at com.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.AioReadCompletionListener.futureCompleted(AioReadCompletionListener.java:165) at com.ibm.io.async.AbstractAsyncFuture.invokeCallback(AbstractAsyncFuture.java:217) at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncChannelFuture.fireCompletionActions(AsyncChannelFuture.java:161) at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncFuture.completed(AsyncFuture.java:136) at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.complete(ResultHandler.java:196) at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.runEventProcessingLoop(ResultHandler.java:751) at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler$2.run(ResultHandler.java:881) at com.ibm.ws.util.ThreadPool$Worker.run(ThreadPool.java:1497) Caused by: javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com/ibm/ram/repository/security/UserSearchUtilities.searchSpecificUsers(Ljava/lang/String;ZLcom/ibm/ram/repository/security/IUser;)Lcom/ibm/ram/common/util/ClosableIterator; at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:131) at com.sun.faces.application.ActionListenerImpl.processAction(ActionListenerImpl.java:73) ... 37 more Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com/ibm/ram/repository/security/UserSearchUtilities.searchSpecificUsers(Ljava/lang/String;ZLcom/ibm/ram/repository/security/IUser;)Lcom/ibm/ram/common/util/ClosableIterator; at com.ibm.ram.repository.web.users.UserSearchUtilities.searchSpecificUsers(UserSearchUtilities.java:61) at pagecode.includes.UserSearchDialog.searchUsers(UserSearchDialog.java:190) at pagecode.includes.UserSearchDialog.doSearch(UserSearchDialog.java:233) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:79) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:618) at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:127) ... 38 more |
5 answers
Hi,
There is something corrupted in your installation. That method has never existed in any release of RAM. First have you shut down completely and restart? Sometimes that fixes problems. When did this start occurring? Immediately after applying testfix 6, or some other time? Any particular event you can recall? If not, then the only thing left I can think of is to reinstall 7202, and then immediately bring down RAM and then reapply the fixpack (though 7202 is now up to testfix 9). Rich |
|
Hi Rich,
We have begun to use this test fix 6 for a long time, and not found this problem before. It just happened these days. Do you suggestion to first restart RAM server to check if can resolve this problem, if not then must reinstall whole RAM server again? Thanks. |
|
On 7/14/2011 2:38 AM, pantian wrote:
Hi Rich, But just the RAM EAR and testfix, not whole RAM server. WAS and everything is fine. -- Rich Kulp Rational Asset Manager developer |
|
On 7/14/2011 10:46 AM, Rich Kulp wrote:
On 7/14/2011 2:38 AM, pantian wrote: yes first try restarting RAM, then: But just reinstall the RAM EAR and testfix, not whole RAM server. WAS and everything is fine. -- Rich Kulp Rational Asset Manager developer |
|
Hi,
I just found out where the method was defined. It was created for just one internal IBM RAM only and no one else in a special internal testfix that no one else should have. If you are that internal RAM customer then that fix is called testfix 901 AND it is only valid when applied on top of testfix 9f. If you are at testfix 6 then that is completely invalid. If you were at testfix 9f and applied 901 and then applied 6 it will break. -- Rich Kulp Rational Asset Manager developer |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.