It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

(View Test Plans) with view as (Tree or Explorer) RQM 2


Pierre Lemay (6142) | asked Oct 30 '09, 11:34 a.m.
When I use the option (View Test Plans) with view as (Tree or Explorer) the test cases are not displayed with the right sort.
For example I have a Test plan with five Test Cases (TC-001 with ID=23, TC-002 with ID=24, TC-003 with ID=25, TC-004 with ID=26 and TC-005 with ID=27).
When I use the Test plan option and then the section Test case, the Test cases are displayed correctly (TC-001, TC-002, TC-003, TC-004, TC-005)
When I use the option (View Test Plans) with view as (Tree or Explorer), The Test cases are displayed with a confusing sort.
(TC-004, TC-005, TC-001, TC-003, TC-002).

Someone know to resolved this displays sort ?

One answer



permanent link
John Nason (2.4k1012) | answered Nov 11 '09, 7:22 p.m.
FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
Unfortunately there is no way to control sort order in those views currently so I can't give you any work-arounds for getting the sort order that you'd like.
We have a couple of workitems for this, including:
https://jazz.net/jazz02/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/20686
and
https://jazz.net/jazz02/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/16266

Regards,
John

When I use the option (View Test Plans) with view as (Tree or Explorer) the test cases are not displayed with the right sort.
For example I have a Test plan with five Test Cases (TC-001 with ID=23, TC-002 with ID=24, TC-003 with ID=25, TC-004 with ID=26 and TC-005 with ID=27).
When I use the Test plan option and then the section Test case, the Test cases are displayed correctly (TC-001, TC-002, TC-003, TC-004, TC-005)
When I use the option (View Test Plans) with view as (Tree or Explorer), The Test cases are displayed with a confusing sort.
(TC-004, TC-005, TC-001, TC-003, TC-002).

Someone know to resolved this displays sort ?

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.