It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Follow this question
Question details

×11,924
×10,908
×10,826

question asked: Aug 01 '13, 8:56 a.m.
question was seen: 5,073 times
last updated: Aug 20 '13, 9:09 a.m.

Related questions

FAQ - How this Forum works

About an RQM api way to automate linking to DOORS requirements using its *attributes* other than just ID, text

0
Sunil Kumar R (1.1k●1●30●44) | asked Aug 01 '13, 8:56 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
In a RQM - DOORS integration scenario, DOORS requirements have a master pool of requirements (module 0) from which new modules (module 1, 2, 3.. n) are derived using DXL scripts.

In DOORS : In the POOL requirement module, there are references and links to the new product module
In RQM the test cases are re-used however the links to the new product module has to be done manually since this information is not visible in RQM, because it’s only list the ID & text of the requirement from the module linked directly.

A solution for us could be that RQM implement a solution like in DOORS where you can make links based on attributes.

Any thoughts and pointers on how to proceed?

Thanks in advance,
Sunil

Accepted answer

1
permanent link
Lei Shi (227●1) | answered Aug 13 '13, 9:35 a.m.
You are using RQMI or OSLC for the integration?

For the RQMI , the DOORS pushs the objects to RQM, so I guess you are using the OSLC, right?

If you are using OSLC, the selection picker is implemented by DOORS team, we can't handle it.

could you ask the DOORS team to help to support attributes in the selection picker, that may resolve the issue you mention.
Sunil Kumar R selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments
Sunil Kumar R commented Aug 20 '13, 9:09 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER

LeiShi, Is there an RQM API way to achieve this if not from the UI?

i.e., an option through the RQM URL utility or any other way to achieve linking of the requirements with RQM artifacts as explained in the first note?

Best Regards, Sunil 

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.