[closed] Work Item ID numbering
Sudhakar Frederick (801●1●36●31)
| asked Dec 04 '08, 2:28 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER closed Jan 11 '21, 4:31 a.m. by Ralph Schoon (63.1k●3●36●46)
Hi
Would there be a way to make the work item IDs for each project area unique an dsequenial for each project area? That is, when I create a new project area the WI numbering should be restarted from 1. Thanks Freddy |
The question has been closed for the following reason: "The question is answered, right answer was accepted" by rschoon Jan 11 '21, 4:31 a.m.
Accepted answer
Freddy,
Unfortunately, in EWM (RTC), work items are numbered on the basis of the server, not the project. Nothing has changed here and there is no way to change this in the system configuration.
Ralph Schoon selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments
This is correct. However this extension might be useful for certain requirements: https://github.com/jazz-community/rtc-workitem-numbering .
In general it would be possible to create an additioanl project area ID using such extensions that are only unique in a project area.
You realise this question is 12 years old? I know nothing's changed but I think Freddie may no longer care about the answer :-)
1
Davyd,
I think I considered that when I was responding to this question. Other people are using forum to search for answers to their questions so I do not think it was lost time :).
Ralph Schoon
commented Dec 28 '20, 4:28 p.m.
| edited Dec 28 '20, 4:33 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER
I value your contrbutions Davyd, Bartosz.
As a moderator, I have decided to accept the answer. It is still true. And I decided to provide additional information. The answer is interesting for the forum. It likely does have no value for Freddy any more, unfortunately.
(Shout out to Freddy from Germany, if you read this, it was a blast to meet in India and to have you on the team. Hope you are doing well down under.)
I would like to ask Davyd and Bartosz to consider using comments and not answers when contemplating the past.
Thanks,
Ralph
|
Comments