Retrieve a workspace from a project area
Hi, there's a way to find out the workspace (or the streams) of a project area?
I know that on client side I could use IWorkflowManager.findWorkspace method, but on the server side which class and method do I have to use? I'm trying to develop a follow-up action which creating a baseline and so I need to retrieve the stream workspace. Any answer will be appreciate. |
4 answers
Does anyone know a service similar to IWorkflowManager which can be used on server side?
|
In general you use IQueryService to find things on the server side, but due to SCM's custom read permissions, they must use their own (internal) IScmQueryService. Its findWorkspaces method is the server-side implementation of the client-side IWorkspaceManager.findWorkspaces.
But note that a given project area may have many streams, and I doubt you would want to create baselines for all of them. It would help to know more about your use case. It may make more sense to have your follow-up action specify the stream (and components?) to operate on as part of its configuration. |
Thank you nedgar, your answers are always precious to me.
My scenario is quite locked beause I have only three stream on projects, and I want to take snapshot only of one of these. I have a work-item which has a long developing workflow which passes between all these three streams. After a deliver on the last stream and a build related to a workspace linked to this stream, the work-item has a "close" action. I want to catch this change-state using a follow-up plugin on save-wi (I prefer this way instead of event handler because it is synchronous) and than create the baseline on this last stream. On your answer you was referring to specific operation on which link a follow-up related to stream or component. I don't see specific operation for stream in the default behaviour operation. Would I have to create a new one operation id or is there something else that I can't find? Thanks again. |
>I don't see specific operation for stream in the default behaviour operation.
I'm not 100% clear on what you're asking here, but I think you're referring to what I said above: > It may make more sense to have your follow-up action specify the stream (and components?) to operate on as part of its configuration For this, you wouldn't need to introduce any new operations, but add configuration data to your follow-up action to specify which stream it should act on. For example, the process configuration/customization XML could specify:
Then in your follow-up action implementation, you would look up the stream name, find the stream by name, then create the baselines / snapshot. |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.