It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Best Practice for Project Management in RQM


renee nelson (781918) | asked Nov 28 '12, 2:42 p.m.

We are considering a new approach to arranging our projects in RQM.

We average around 5 large to medium projects a year and several service requests.

We were thinking about creating a Project for each project (that will display in the drop down).

We would like to configure each Project with our categories, team members, etc....

We would also like to configure each Project with RTC and RRC.

We would like some advise (pros, cons, past experience, what has worked for you, what has not worked for you, any suggestions).

Thanks!

Renee


Comments
renee nelson commented Nov 28 '12, 2:44 p.m. | edited Nov 29 '12, 6:35 p.m.

we are currently on 3.0.1.2 but will be upgrading to 4.0 in a month

3 answers



permanent link
James Wulf (11) | answered Feb 06 '13, 3:33 a.m.
You can find ideas about Project Management here at www.onlineprojectplanning.com.

Cheers!

permanent link
Jerry Shengulette (63914) | answered Dec 12 '12, 11:59 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
Here's another interesting article:

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/dchadwick/entry/jazz_products_and_project_areas35?lang=en

permanent link
Jerry Shengulette (63914) | answered Dec 12 '12, 9:25 a.m.
JAZZ DEVELOPER
I haven't found a single source answer for this (which isn't unexpected) but these links seem like a good starting point for investigation:

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/clmhelp/v4r0/topic/com.ibm.rational.test.qm.doc/topics/c_workflows_guidance.html?resultof=%22%62%65%73%74%22%20%22%70%72%61%63%74%69%63%65%73%22%20%22%70%72%61%63%74%69%63%22%20

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/practices/test_mgmnt/

Hopefully the community at large will eventually respond with their practical anecdotes.

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.