Difference in accessing records between clients
How can I find out the difference in accessing records between the Web and Eclipse clients? specifically with Defect type records.
The reason I ask is because our Web Client is extremely slow in accessing or creating Defects, but the Eclipse client is fast. Both clients are fast with other Record Types. How could I go about debugging the Web Client to see where it's hanging when accessing the defect records? thanks in advance. |
3 answers
Thank you for the reply Jean-Michel. I create work item 106120 with The call loads 5.6MB of data for some reason. This could be the regression: https://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/104474 I'll add further comments in work item #106120 -- Regards, Patrick Jazz Work Item Team |
One thing you could try is using metronome in the Eclipse client (http://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/01/the-jazz-metronome-tool-keeps-us-honest/) and measure the round-trips for creating a defect and the server response times. Then in Firefox, install firebug and do the same. Can you attach your findings to a work item and provide information about your server setup? Thank you for the reply Jean-Michel. I create work item 106120 with output from Firebug. I noticed the link below is taking 1 min 34 seconds to complete. Do you know what this is doing? https://svlrtc.svl.ibm.com:9445/jazz/service/com.ibm.team.workitem.common.internal.rest.IWorkItemRestService/workItemEditableProperties?itemId=_FH10cA7lEd-JKcZ_vEnFbA&projectAreaItemId=_wHRvYKlEEd6kIOog97yerQ |
One thing you could try is using metronome in the Eclipse client (http://jazz.net/blog/index.php/2008/02/01/the-jazz-metronome-tool-keeps-us-honest/) and measure the round-trips for creating a defect and the server response times. Then in Firefox, install firebug and do the same. Can you attach your findings to a work item and provide information about your server setup?
Cheers, Jean-Michel |
Your answer
Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.