Hi

We have changed our project process on delivery so that it requires a work item and a comment to be completed. This works fine in the Eclipse client but does not seem to work using the GUI and I am still allowed to make changes to files without a work item.

Any ideas?

thanks

David

I believe the process advisors have to be hooked up to the web client's delivery so this is expected. There is still work to be done and is targeted for 3.0.

https://jazz.net/jazz/web/projects/Rational%20Team%20Concert#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=98757

If you are doing this check on the server, then it should apply no
matter what client you are using, so the first thing to verify is that
it is the "Deliver (Server)" operation you are checking (and not the
Deliver (Client)" operation).

Assuming you have set the check on the Deliver(Server) operation, the
next thing to verify is that you have checked the "an associated work
item" or the "both" radio button for that process precondition.

And if you have done both of these things, and still see the behavior,
you should file a defect work item on it, because I don't think this is
covered by work item 98757 (the SCM team will then decide if I'm right
or not :-).

Cheers,
Geoff

tmok wrote:

daviesdwrote:
Hi
We have changed our project process on delivery so that it requires
a work item and a comment to be completed. This works fine in the
Eclipse client but does not seem to work using the GUI and I am still
allowed to make changes to files without a work item.
Any ideas?

thanks

David

I believe the process advisors have to be hooked up to the web
client's delivery so this is expected. There is still work to be done
and is targeted for 3.0.

https://jazz.net/jazz/web/projects/Rational%20Team%20Concert#action=com.ibm.team.workitem.viewWorkItem&id=98757

We are also having this issue. Our precondition operation (both client and server) for delivery requires a change set comment and work item, and work item set to current owner. However, modifying files directly on the stream from the web gui does not seem to require any of these. Is this still considered a delivery and the delivery rules apply? If not, how can we enforce similar rules for our web gui users?

Additionally, I was able to associate a work item that was from another project area. Should this be allowed and how could I stop it?

If you are using 2.*, this is expected behavior (see earlier post to
this thread). It should be fixed in 3.0.

Cheers,
Geoff

On 10/26/2010 11:53 AM, vrcampbell wrote:

We are also having this issue. Our precondition operation (both
client and server) for delivery requires a change set comment and
work item, and work item set to current owner. However, modifying
files directly on the stream from the web gui does not seem to
require any of these. Is this still considered a delivery and the
delivery rules apply? If not, how can we enforce similar rules for
our web gui users?