It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Follow this question
Question details

×42,787
×11,924
×11

question asked: Feb 25 '19, 8:08 a.m.
question was seen: 918 times
last updated: Feb 25 '19, 12:50 p.m.

Related questions

FAQ - How this Forum works

Continuous Integration Scenario

0
Chidambaram L (234●1●41●78) | asked Feb 25 '19, 8:08 a.m.
edited Feb 25 '19, 10:30 a.m.
Let us say that Dev1 & Dev2 develops java code in Component_A in Dev_Stream1; Dev1 & Dev2 are implementing a feature together. Estimated effort is 2 man-weeks.
Dev3 & Dev4 develops java code in Component_B in Dev_Stream2; binary of both components are jar file.
Developers manually deliver the change sets to the Integration Stream. Integration Stream builds a war file. Integration Stream can be configured for CI where Build will be triggered every 5 minutes.

Lowest level Stream is the Dev Stream, where Dev1 & Dev2 exchange their code. All deliveries to Dev Stream would not be buildable; build will succeed in Dev Stream only when the feature is completely developed.

How to implement CI to Dev Stream. Should the work break down be planned in such a way that daily Deliver of Dev1 & Dev2 will still build ?

One answer

Most liked answers|Newest answers ↑|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Ralph Schoon (63.1k●3●36●46) | answered Feb 25 '19, 11:27 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER

I think that the setup of a development stream that not builds is the first fundamental issue in the whole set up. 

Not only should daily delivers build, but the development build should build.
I don't see what work breakdown (usually I would use this as how the work items are organized in hierarchies) has anything to do with the stream hierarchy.

In general continuous integration to me means that you build and test often and not being able to build and test is a no no. 

Comments
Chidambaram L commented Feb 25 '19, 11:37 a.m.

Yes. by work breakdown, I mean work items, its schedules & its assignments. Daily builds in Development Stream should break, for the developer to identify the conflicts early.

Ralph Schoon commented Feb 25 '19, 12:50 p.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER

For a build to break, the build has to be buildable and executable. You say your buids are not designed that way:

"All deliveries to Dev Stream would not be buildable; build will succeed in Dev Stream only when the feature is completely developed."
I think this is a fundamental problem and should be fixed.


Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.