It's all about the answers!

Ask a question

Question on organizing code in project


Narayanan Potti (27037679) | asked Aug 25 '09, 12:22 p.m.
Hi

In my company the development team works on 4 modules which are identified by the functional areas being developed. Each team has about 5 developers. In RTC I created one project and then created team areas for each module in the project. Each team area has one component associated with it. I received a requirement from the development team lead that members of each of the teams need read-only access to all of the components. How can the read permissions to other teams areas be granted ? Will it require members of all the teams need to join all other teams ? Any ideas / recommendations ?

I would really appreciate any help with this.

Thank You
npotti

One answer



permanent link
Narayanan Potti (27037679) | answered Aug 26 '09, 1:56 p.m.
Hi

I want to add that we're currently using RTC 1.0.1.1. From what I read with other posts in this forum RTC 2.0 provides a new access control functionality in the project area. We're not at that version yet. Can anyone suggest how to grant read-only access to a team area for members of other teams, all the teams are in the same project.

Thank You
npotti

Hi

In my company the development team works on 4 modules which are identified by the functional areas being developed. Each team has about 5 developers. In RTC I created one project and then created team areas for each module in the project. Each team area has one component associated with it. I received a requirement from the development team lead that members of each of the teams need read-only access to all of the components. How can the read permissions to other teams areas be granted ? Will it require members of all the teams need to join all other teams ? Any ideas / recommendations ?

I would really appreciate any help with this.

Thank You
npotti

Your answer


Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.