LPA/RQM/Doors - extensions
![]()
Hi All,
Is it possible to extend the LPA (or) extend doors/RQM? I couldn't find the SDK for tools except RTC.
I am looking at customizing the LPA traceability links and other features.
Please advise.
Thanks.
|
One answer
![]()
DOORS NG has a client extension API documented here:
https://jazz.net/wiki/bin/view/Main/RMExtensionsMain It doesn't have much in the way of cross domain link capabilities but you should take a look and see if it can help you. There's also the OSLC APIs that all the products have. Depending on quite what you're trying to achieve maybe a small application built on top of those would be more suitable than an extension built into the products? Comments Thanks Dominic. I havent tried out OSLC APIs. Are you saying that it is achievable using OSLC APIs of the CLM Products?
Thanks Dominic. I havent tried out OSLC APIs. Are you saying that it is achievable using OSLC APIs of the CLM Products?
I'm not sure that what you want to do is achievable because I don't know quite what you're trying to do. If you want to be able to examine, create and delete links between data in the CLM Products then the OSLC APIs should permit this.
Thanks. I am creating a new link type between RTC and RRC. If I create a RTC plugin to get the new link type, what would be the RRC package to refer to as endpoint (like com.ibm.RQM.planning for RQM) ?
I am not sure if RRC api has a feature to create new link types.
The RM API does not have the capability to add new link types. Also, our internal implementation is different to that in RTC so I don't believe there is any "package" you can refer to in RM to do this.
Thanks Dominic. Actually, i am looking to just modify the name of existing CLM Link type in RRC (or) create new link type with same functionality as existing.For example,
instead of tracked by-> i want to use affected by [to link RRC Artifact to RTC Workitem].
Since we are not changing functions, can this be a straight-forward one as a project template customization?
Thanks.
Hi,
showing 5 of 7
show 2 more comments
|