What is the difference between Jazz and Jazz for Service Management
I was looking for solutions to integrate data from TADDM into Jazz on this forum.
I saw some articles dating back 2010 which talked about integrating RQM and TADDM.
Then I googled TADDM and Jazz and saw that it integrates with IBM Jazz Service Management.
I there a difference between Jazz and Jazz SM. Can I still use TADDM to get data about systems into my lifecycle project?
Thanx for any info
One answer
Hi Mark,
Although this is not my favorite area but as far as I know TADDM, TPM, TRM and Test Lab Manager (CLM component) can be integrated to provide provisioning and deployment capability of resources in a virtual environment like SmartCloud. I haven't much heard about the term Jazz for Service Management but my guess would be that it suggests that you can leverage Jazz to integrate with Tivoli products to perform end to end Service Management of your Test Lab resources.
This article should give you more detailed information and have a lot of references as well.
Hope this helps
Although this is not my favorite area but as far as I know TADDM, TPM, TRM and Test Lab Manager (CLM component) can be integrated to provide provisioning and deployment capability of resources in a virtual environment like SmartCloud. I haven't much heard about the term Jazz for Service Management but my guess would be that it suggests that you can leverage Jazz to integrate with Tivoli products to perform end to end Service Management of your Test Lab resources.
This article should give you more detailed information and have a lot of references as well.
Hope this helps
Comments
The server is down where the article is posted, but I will check on it later.
I am not looking for service management of test servers (though that would be a good idea as well).
I am looking for a snapshot of servers and interfaces as artifacts in Jazz so that for example I could map a test case ==> to a release ==> to the server it is deployed on.
I have read through the article. It is interesting, but not what I'm looking for.